Parents who smoke often open a window or turn
on a fan to clear the air of second-hand smoke, but experts now have identified
another smoking-related threat to children's health that isn't as easy to get
rid of: third-hand smoke.
That's the term being used to describe the
invisible yet toxic brew of gases and particles clinging to smokers' hair and
clothing, not to mention cushions and carpeting, that lingers long after smoke
has cleared from a room. The residue includes heavy metals, carcinogens and
even radioactive materials that young children can get on their hands and
ingest, especially if they're crawling or playing on the floor.
Doctors from MassGeneral Hospital for Children
in Boston coined the term "third-hand smoke" to describe these
chemicals in a new study that focused on the risks they pose to infants and
children. The study was published in this month's issue of the
journal Pediatrics.
"Everyone knows that second-hand smoke is
bad, but they don't know about this," said Dr. Jonathan Winickoff, the
lead author of the study and an assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard
Medical School.
"When their kids are out of the house,
they might smoke. Or they smoke in the car. Or they strap the kid in the car
seat in the back and crack the window and smoke, and they think it's okay
because the second-hand smoke isn't getting to their kids," Winickoff continued.
"We needed a term to describe these tobacco toxins that
aren't visible."
Third-hand smoke is what one smells when a
smoker gets in an elevator after going outside for a cigarette, he said, or in
a hotel room where people were smoking. "Your nose isn't lying," he
said. "The stuff is so toxic that your brain is telling you:
'Get away.'"
The study reported on attitudes toward smoking
in 1,500 households across the United States. It found that the vast majority
of both smokers and nonsmokers were aware that second-hand smoke is harmful to
children. Some 95 percent of nonsmokers and 84 percent of smokers agreed with
the statement that "inhaling smoke from a parent's cigarette can harm the
health of infants and children."
But far fewer of those surveyed were aware of
the risks of third-hand smoke. Since the term is so new, the researchers asked
people if they agreed with the statement that "breathing air in a room
today where people smoked yesterday can harm the health of infants and
children." Only 65 percent of nonsmokers and 43 percent of smokers agreed
with that statement, which researchers interpreted as acknowledgement of the
risks of third-hand smoke.
The belief that second-hand smoke harms
children's health was not independently associated with strict smoking bans in
homes and cars, the researchers found. On the other hand, the belief that
third-hand smoke was harmful greatly increased the likelihood the respondent
also would enforce a strict smoking ban at home, Winickoff said.
"That tells us we're onto an important
new health message here," he said. "What we heard in focus group
after focus group was, 'I turn on the fan and the smoke disappears.' It made us
realize how many people think about second-hand smoke — they're telling us they
know it's bad but they've figured out a way to do it."
The data was collected in a national
random-digit-dial telephone survey done between September and November 2005.
The sample was weighted by race and gender, based on census information.
Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician who heads
the Children's Environmental Health Center at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in
New York, said the phrase third-hand smoke is a brand-new term that has
implications for behavior.
"The central message here is that simply
closing the kitchen door to take a smoke is not protecting the kids from the
effects of that smoke," he said. "There are carcinogens in this
third-hand smoke, and they are a cancer risk for anybody of any age who comes
into contact with them."
Among the substances in third-hand smoke are
hydrogen cyanide, used in chemical weapons; butane, which is used in lighter
fluid; toluene, found in paint thinners; arsenic; lead; carbon monoxide; and
even polonium-210, the highly radioactive carcinogen that was used to murder
former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko in 2006. Eleven of the compounds are
highly carcinogenic. Recommend More Articles in Health »